Exiwolf vs. Ignitor
It is a question that is just as hard to answer as the chicken and the egg quandary.
While the jury is out on which tire is better, I do have some opinions on each.
Exi or Ignitor?
WTB Exiwolf 2.3
It's a directional high volume tire, with shallow lugs, I'm running the kevlar version.
My first impression was instant love. I have long been a fan of WTB rubber, but I'm always leery of trying anything "new". After running Weirwolfs on my 26ers for many years, I thought Exis would make me just as happy. Though light they are not (around 820g for a kevlar bead tire), they're not a far stretch for someone who was pushing around a 750g 26" tire.
One of the cool things about this tire, is that on a wide rim, they become quite round. There is no transition point form the center knobs to the side knobs, making for a tire that you can really push without that squirmy feeling once you reach the point where the side lugs give up.
Of course, that also means, when you are out of grip, they slide.
They excelled on roots and dry off camber stuff, on wet they slid, predictable however, and regained their grip quickly.
I was also very surprised how well they gripped in the mud despite the shallow lugs, and relatively close tread pattern. They actually throw mud really well, and only spin if you unweight the saddle.
Thumbs up.
Maxxis Ignitor 2.1
Another directional tire, but lower volume. Despite this, the casing is only a bit smaller than the Exi. Tread is ramped, tightly spaced series of pentagons.
Well after spending most of the spring on the Exi, I really needed to be wowed to make a permanent change. Needless to say, I was wowed. The Ignitor rolls fast! And it's quite a bit lighter than the Exi, over 100g in some cases. It is not as high volume as the Exi, but almost the same size when comparing how the tread fills the chainstays.
The grip is all there - to a point. By this I mean, that the profile of this tire is more square, once you compromise the knobs, you slide. This tire exhibits a "tipping point", and also I feel it doesn't have as much traction on actual obstacles the way the Exi does. My first experience on this tire was at Catamount during the weekly race. I felt as if the tire could only be pushed so far before slipping on roots and rocks.
They also don't shed mud as well, but for some reason, they still hang on.
That being said, it is falling into line. Either I am learning, or the tire is breaking in. I am running lower pressure now, and it seems to be making a big difference.
Cool.
So?
Exis - Good all around grip in most conditions, slide controllably when pushed. Kinda heavy, but full of surprises when you think traction is not attainable.
Ignitors - Fast. Good grip. Light. Unpredictable in rooty sections, but extremely able tires in any condition, once you know the limits, they do not disappoint.
Yeah... I didn't really pick one did I?
Can't I just like both of them? Geez, it's almost like picking which one of your kids you like more...
5 Comments:
G: The Ignitor struck me as a tire that required a few less pounds per square inch of pressure compared to others I've run. Curious as to whether or not you found that to be true? If I ran them at the same pressures that I usually do, they felt harsh and slipped out more.
I think that what you may be feeling is the tipping point of the Ignitor. Those side knobs can only be pushed so far before they fold. Overall, grip is quite good, but they exhibit the same sort of "fold over" that Nokian Gazzalodi Cores did when pushed. They simply don't like it. I noticed that they Ignitors didn't "embrace" the roots and rocks I was riding over with the same gusto that my Exis did. I think that it's because it's a relatively low volume tire.
You (me personally) can't run lower pressures with this tire because of rim bump.
That being said, I like the Ignitors, I think they can be made to do what I want, how I want...
asking for the best tire is like asking for the best bike, or the best car, or the best anything for that matter.
What really needs to be asked along with the question is some type of qualifier, such as, "in wet and rocky conditions," or "in sandy turns."
But hey, I've run neither of these tires, so who am I to chime in? I've only ridden them in 26"!
On a full suspension 26" wheeled bike, on western pennsylvania moist spring trails, I'll take the Exi Wolf. :)
-michael
I'm running ignitors in the southern California Desert. With the recent wet stuff the tires do have issue clearing mud and wet sand but I second the writers comment that it doesn't create a problem with traction. I think it's because the tread pattern clears most of it.
In the dry they do roll very fast, for 350 days of the year that's what matters most to me here in socalif...
its late 2010 and a few years later from this posting. how do these tires stack up against
newer tires in the market. I'm thinking of replacing my conti mk with the exi for my wet/ winter tire
Post a Comment
<< Home